A CRITICAL THEOLOGICAL STUDY TO UNDERSTANDING JESUS AS RELIGIOUS ALLEGORY PART 2 OF 4 PARTS

A CRITICAL THEOLOGICAL STUDY TO UNDERSTANDING JESUS AS RELIGIOUS ALLEGORY PART 2. DOES NOT ATTEMPT TO PROVIDE ANY THEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF JESUS AS ALLEGORY. BECAUSE THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AGAINST IT. EXCEPT AS TO, THE LACK OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF A HUMAN JESUS. USING THE EVIDENTIARY SOURCES PROVIDED TO HUMANITY BY THE PATRISTIC (ROMAN) CHRISTIAN CHURCH. WHILE THE PATRISTIC (ROMAN) CHRISTIAN CHURCH CONTINUES TO BE ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN HIDING THE TRUTH (THE UNEMOTIONAL SCIENTIFIC FACTS) FROM HUMANITY. YET, ACTIVELY ENGAGING ITSELF IN CREATING THE ERRONEOUS AND ILLOGICAL, EMOTIONAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL AND RELIGIOUS FOG FOR HUMANITY. THAT THE BELIEF IN THE PATRISTIC (ROMAN) CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS TRADITION AND BLIND THEOLOGICAL PATRISTIC (ROMAN) CHRISTIAN FAITH CAN CREATE REALITY (UNEMOTIONAL SCIENTIFIC FACTS)

A CRITICAL THEOLOGICAL STUDY TO UNDERSTANDING JESUS AS RELIGIOUS ALLEGORY PART 2

All of the religious and/or non-Christian references to the human rather than allegorical Jesus can be shown to have either been introduced late in antiquity by Patristic (Roman) Christian scribes or were originally based on Patristic (Roman) Christian claims. There are four primary non-Christian historical potential references to Jesus Christ in the existing secular literature. All of these references are in works that were written centuries after the Gnostic (Judaic) Gospels had been written and appear centuries later during the…